How To Analyze Malware Using Various Analysis Techniques

Malware, short for “malicious software”, is intended to harm a computer system, network or mobile device.

It’s typically created by cybercriminals who want to steal information, damage a computer system or use it as part of a botnet for illegal activities, like DDoS attacks.

The number and sophistication of malware attacks have increased significantly in recent years, necessitating the use of advanced techniques by computer security professionals to analyze and comprehend the behavior of these threats.

This article will go over advanced malware analysis techniques, such as static, dynamic, behavioral and memory analysis.

These techniques are critical for understanding malware behavior, reverse engineering it and developing countermeasures.

Static analysis

Static analysis is useful for identifying known malware signatures and other characteristics, as well as detecting any potential system vulnerabilities that the malware may exploit.

Static analysis can provide valuable insights into the behavior of malware, assisting security researchers and analysts in developing effective countermeasures.

Code decompilation is a technique used in static analysis. To analyze the malware’s behavior, the binary code must be converted into human-readable source code.

Decompilation can aid in the detection of malicious activity, such as attempts to modify system files or registry keys, as well as backdoors or other malicious code embedded within the malware.

String analysis is another technique used in static analysis. This entails searching the malware’s code for any strings that may indicate malicious activity, such as URLs or command strings.

String analysis can assist in identifying the malware’s command and control infrastructure, as well as other malicious activity, such as attempts to steal sensitive data or launch denial-of-service attacks.

Static analysis may also include the use of tools to analyze the malware’s code and detect any obfuscation or packing techniques used to avoid detection.

Obfuscation techniques make the code intentionally difficult to read or understand, whereas packing techniques compress the code to make it smaller and more difficult to analyze.

These techniques can make it difficult for security researchers and analysts to determine the true functionality and capabilities of the malware. Such tools as deobfuscators and unpackers, on the other hand, can be used to reverse these techniques and reveal the malware’s true behavior.

Finally, static analysis may include the examination of any configuration files or scripts associated with the malware.

This method can aid in the identification of any hardcoded values or URLs that may be used for command-and-control communication.

Furthermore, analyzing configuration files can assist in identifying any potential system vulnerabilities that the malware may exploit.

Overall, static analysis is a useful technique for detecting known malware signatures and identifying potential system vulnerabilities that the malware may exploit.

Dynamic analysis

Dynamic analysis is a technique used for analyzing malware that involves running it in a controlled environment and observing its behavior.

This method can be used to recognize the malware’s evasion techniques, as well as any network communication it may initiate.

Manual or automated tools, such as sandbox environments or emulation software, can be used to perform dynamic analysis.

One of the primary advantages of dynamic analysis is that it allows analysts to observe malware behavior in real time, which can aid in the detection of malicious activity that would otherwise be missed by static analysis.

Dynamic analysis can include tools that can hook into the malware’s API calls and monitor its execution in addition to observing its behavior.

This process can aid in the detection of any suspicious activity, such as attempts to modify system files or registry keys.

Memory analysis is another technique used in dynamic analysis. This entails examining the malware’s memory dump for any malicious activity, such as the presence of backdoors or rootkits.

Memory analysis can be useful for identifying malware that is designed to hide its presence in the memory or evade detection by traditional security controls.

Dynamic analysis can also be used to examine the network behavior of malware.

Analysts can detect suspicious activity, such as attempts to connect to remote servers or establish command and control channels, by monitoring the malware’s network traffic.

This method can assist in identifying the malware’s C2 infrastructure, as well as other malicious activity.

Moreover, dynamic analysis can include tools that simulate user interaction with malware in addition to analyzing the malware’s behavior.

This technique can aid in the detection of malicious behavior that is triggered by user actions, such as opening a specific file or clicking on a specific link.

Analysts can gain a enhanced understanding of the malware’s behavior and capabilities by simulating user interaction, which can help inform future analysis and response efforts.

Behavioral analysis

Behavioral analysis, as opposed to static analysis, which focuses on the code itself, or dynamic analysis, which involves executing the malware, involves observing the malware’s actions on the system.

This technique can be used to detect new and unknown malware, as well as advanced persistent threats (APTs) that may evade traditional security controls.

Analysts typically observe the behavior of malware in a controlled environment, such as a sandbox, when performing behavioral analysis.

This entails monitoring system activity, such as file changes, network traffic and registry changes, in order to detect any suspicious activity.

Analysts can also employ tools that monitor system activity and detect unusual behavior, such as attempts to escalate privileges or access sensitive data.

Code injection is a technique used in behavioral analysis. This entails injecting code into the malware’s process in order to monitor its behavior and detect any malicious activity.

Code injection can be useful for detecting hidden backdoors or other malicious code that would otherwise be difficult to detect.

However, it is risky because it may activate anti-analysis techniques, causing the malware to terminate or evade detection.

Anomaly detection is another technique used in behavioral analysis. This entails comparing the malware’s behavior to a baseline of normal system activity to detect any deviations.

For example, if the malware attempts to modify system files or establish network connections in ways that are not consistent with normal system behavior, it may be flagged as suspicious.

Anomaly detection can be useful for identifying zero-day exploits and other previously unknown malware.

Finally, behavioral analysis can include the use of AI and machine learning techniques to detect patterns of behavior that may indicate malicious activity.

This may entail training models on large datasets of normal and malicious system behavior in order to detect subtle changes in behavior that may indicate malware.

Machine learning can help detect new and unknown malware, as well as APTs that may evade traditional signature-based detection methods.

Memory analysis

Memory analysis is a malware analysis technique that involves examining the malware’s memory dump to detect any malicious activity.

This method can be used to detect rootkits and other malware that may be hiding in memory.

To conduct memory analysis, a forensic analyst will create a memory dump of the infected system using such a tool as a memory acquisition tool.

This memory dump will then be examined using memory analysis software to detect any malicious activity.

Signature scanning is one of the techniques used in memory analysis. S

earching the memory dump for known malware signatures, such as the presence of specific strings or file headers, is required. This technique can aid in the detection of known malware infections.

Heuristics analysis is another technique used in memory analysis.

This entails inspecting the memory dump for any unusual or suspicious behavior, such as unexpected changes to system files or registry keys.

This technique can aid in the detection of new and unknown malware infections.

Memory analysis can include tools that monitor system activity and detect any suspicious behavior, such as attempts to modify system files or registry keys, in addition to analyzing the memory dump.

This method can assist in identifying any malware that is actively running in memory and evading detection.

A forensic analyst may also use the process hollowing technique to conduct memory analysis. This entails creating a new process, inserting malware code into it and then observing its behavior.

The analyst can then monitor the malware’s activity and identify any anti-analysis techniques employed by the malware, as well as any malicious activity.

This technique can assist in determining the true functionality and capabilities of the malware, as well as any hidden backdoors or other malicious code.

Sandbox analysis

Sandbox analysis is a technique used to analyze malware in a prohibited environment, such as a virtual machine, to observe its behavior.

This technique can be used to detect new and unknown malware as well as advanced persistent threats (APTs) that may evade traditional security controls.

Sandbox analysis entails running the malware and watching its behavior for malicious activity.

The ability to observe malware behavior in a controlled environment is one of the advantages of sandbox analysis.

This enables analysts to detect any suspicious activity, such as attempts to modify system files or registry keys, without causing any harm to the host system.

Sandbox analysis can also assist in identifying any anti-analysis techniques used by the malware, such as code obfuscation or packing, that may allow the malware to evade traditional security controls.

In addition to observe the behavior of the malware, sandbox analysis may include the use of tools that monitor system activity and detect any suspicious behavior.

Tools that monitor system calls, network traffic or file system activity are examples of this. Analysts can detect attempts by malware to communicate with remote servers, steal data or both by monitoring these activities.

Finally, sandbox analysis can also involve using multiple virtual machines to simulate a network environment.

This can help identify any lateral movement or propagation techniques used by the malware, as well as any attempts to exploit vulnerabilities in network devices or other systems.

By using multiple virtual machines, analysts can observe the malware’s behavior in a more realistic environment and identify any tactics used to evade detection.

Overall, sandbox analysis is a powerful technique for analyzing malware in a controlled environment.

By observing the malware’s behavior and using various tools to monitor system activity, analysts can identify any suspicious activity and gain insights into the malware’s functionality and capabilities.

API monitoring

API monitoring involves keeping an eye on the system’s APIs for any suspicious activity. This process can aid in the detection of malware that attempts to modify system files or create new processes.

API monitoring can be accomplished with a variety of tools, including API hooking and interception.

API monitoring can include monitoring both the system’s APIs and the APIs used by malware. This method can assist in determining the malware’s capabilities and how it interacts with the system.

Runtime behavior analysis is another technique used in API monitoring. This entails analyzing the malware’s behavior during runtime to detect any malicious activity, such as the creation of new processes or network connections.

Network traffic analysis

Monitoring network traffic generated by malware to detect malicious activity is what network traffic analysis entails.

This technique can aid in the detection of any network communication between the malware and C2 servers or other malware, as well as any data exfiltrated from the system.

Network traffic analysis can include not only monitoring network traffic but also analyzing the protocols used by malware.

This technique can assist in identifying any unusual network activity, such as the use of non-standard protocols or network traffic modification.

Traffic correlation is another technique used in network traffic analysis. This entails correlating malware-generated network traffic with other data, such as file activity or system log files.

File analysis

The process of analyzing files associated with malware, such as executables, DLLs and configuration files, is known as file analysis.

This technique can aid in the detection of hardcoded values or strings, as well as code patterns that may indicate malicious activity.

File analysis can include examining any file activity generated by the malware in addition to examining the files associated with the malware.

This method can assist in identifying any files created or modified by the malware, as well as any files that may have been exfiltrated from the system.

Cryptographic analysis is another technique used in file analysis. This entails examining any cryptographic algorithms employed by the malware to encrypt data or communication.

This technique can aid in the detection of any malicious activity, such as the theft of sensitive data.

Reverse engineering

Reverse engineering entails decompiling the malware’s code in order to comprehend its inner workings. This technique is useful for determining malware capabilities and evasion methods.

Reverse engineering can entail the use of various tools, such as disassemblers and debuggers.

Reverse engineering can include analyzing the malware’s configuration files in addition to decompiling the malware’s code.

This system can aid in the detection of any hardcoded values or strings that may indicate malicious activity.

Code analysis is another technique used in reverse engineering. This entails examining the malware’s code for any code patterns that could indicate malicious activity.

This method can assist in identifying any anti-analysis techniques used by the malware, such as obfuscation or packing.

Machine learning

Machine learning is the process of analyzing data and identify patterns that may indicate malicious activity using algorithms.

This technique can be used to detect unknown or zero-day malware, as well as APTs and other sophisticated attacks.

This technique, in addition to being used to detect malware, can also be used to detect anomalies.

Analyzing system behavior and identifying any deviations from normal behavior that may indicate a security breach are both part of this process.

Clustering analysis is another machine-learning technique. This entails categorizing malware samples based on their behavior or code patterns.

This technique can aid in determining the source of the malware and its possible origin.

How to learn more about cybersecurity

For students interested in learning more about malware analysis and cybersecurity, an online master’s degree in cybersecurity is the perfect opportunity to do so.

At St. Bonaventure University, students can pursue online coursework to fulfill the requirements of a master’s in cybersecurity.

This highly interactive learning environment is made up of expert faculty to help students learn specific technical and soft skills that helps them thrive as industry professionals.

Conclusion

To summarize, malware analysis is an important component of cybersecurity because it assists organizations in identifying and responding to security threats.

Static analysis, dynamic analysis, behavioral analysis, memory analysis, sandbox analysis, API monitoring, network traffic analysis, file analysis, reverse engineering and machine learning are some of the techniques used in malware analysis.

Analysts can gain a improved understanding of the malware’s capabilities and method of evasion by combining these techniques.

This enables organizations to put in place effective security controls in order to prevent future attacks.

It is significant to note that malware analysis is a continuous process because attackers are constantly refining their methods to avoid detection.

As such, organizations must remain vigilant and stay up to date with the latest malware analysis techniques and tools to effectively defend against security threats.